Counties available on the site at launch

Please find below a full list of the 36 counties available at launch. Please see our separate post on the rollout dates of the remaining counties.

If you have not already seen it, we have already posted an article on the order of scanning and rollout of the counties, click below to read it:

http://blog.1911census.co.uk/2008/12/the-order-of-scanning-and-our-unintentional-northsouth-divide/

Counties available at launch:

 

  1. Bedfordshire
  2. Berkshire
  3. Buckinghamshire
  4. Cambridgeshire
  5. Cheshire
  6. Cornwall
  7. Derbyshire
  8. Devonshire
  9. Dorsetshire
  10. Essex
  11. Gloucestershire
  12. Hampshire
  13. Herefordshire
  14. Hertfordshire
  15. Huntingdonshire
  16. Kent
  17. Lancashire
  18. Leicestershire
  19. Lincolnshire
  20. London
  21. Middlesex
  22. Norfolk
  23. Northamptonshire
  24. Nottinghamshire
  25. Oxfordshire
  26. Rutlandshire
  27. Shropshire
  28. Somersetshire
  29. Staffordshire
  30. Suffolk
  31. Surrey
  32. Sussex
  33. Warwickshire
  34. Wiltshire
  35. Worcestershire
  36. Yorkshire West Riding

 Counties not available for launch:

 England:

 

  • Durham
  • Cumberland
  • Northumberland
  • Westmorland
  • Yorkshire – East Riding and North Riding

 Wales:

 

  • Anglesey
  • Brecknockshire
  • Carnarvonshire
  • Cardiganshire
  • Carmarthenshire
  • Denbighshire
  • Flintshire
  • Glamorgan
  • Merionethshire
  • Montgomeryshire
  • Monmouthshire
  • Pembrokeshire
  • Radnorshire

Other:

 

  • Isle of Man
  • Channel Islands
  • Royal Navy
  • Military Establishments

Tags: , , , , ,

28 Responses to “Counties available on the site at launch”

  1. Ieaun Rees Says:

    What a cheek. Some blatent English favouritism (whether direct or indirect) in selction of counties available. When are you going to include the Welsh counties?

  2. Lowri Roberts Says:

    I would also like to know when the Welsh counties will be included. Is it possible for you to provide a better idea of when they will be available to search, e.g. by April 2009 or by January 2010?
    It is a great shame that no Welsh counties are available to search as all my ancestors are Welsh!

  3. Andrew Williamson Says:

    Why no Cumbria? (Cumberland)

  4. K.Creighton Says:

    What about the Irish ??
    1911 England was still governing then or was no census taken in Ireland ??

  5. Joe Dixon Says:

    No Co. Durham and Northumberland - -the only counties I am interested in.

    Only after I bought some credits did I discover these two have to wait!!

    The money is irrelevant- -but it should have been publicised this morning.

  6. peter wells Says:

    you do not yet show my uncle frank wells born 1879 he lived at 52 pritchard road now bethnal green then in haggerston stated his birth place as st. lukes on account he was born in hoxton died at warton house shoreditch now bethnal green in 1952 warton house is now part of the boundary estate all his family had married and moved out of prichard road in the period 1911

  7. peter wells Says:

    what good is a census that does not show the east end

  8. ann Says:

    When is the site going to be available again ?? This is a much needed and awaited site for millions and will be an important vehicle for people wanting to find family connections so get it up and running A.S.A.P

  9. Maria Says:

    Though I am pleased that we are able to search the 1911 census so soon there is nothing for the Welsh until a later date - the English have been well catered for & given the usual priority over everyone else. I think that the areas released should have been more balanced.

  10. Andy Wright Says:

    While I was happy to see the census up and running, the lack of North and East Yorkshire has meant that 50% of those I am searching for are not available.

    If I had realised this, I would have waited a while before joining, but at least we havent had to wait until 2011!!.

  11. jean farmery Says:

    You can please some people some of the time……but you can`t please all of the people all of the time !!!!!!!!!!!!!

    A happy bunny …living in wales with english and welsh ancestors.!

  12. Peter Says:

    Once again favouratism is rampant, towards the South of England. The North East of England has been totally ignored. No trace of Northumberland, Durham, Yorkshire (etc) but everywhere else in England is included. When are you going to include these Northern English counties??

  13. Pamela Says:

    When will Cumberland and Northumberland be available?
    We have bought credits and none of our ancestors are accessible. !!!!
    Why was it not publicised that all of England except the north would be available?

    The world does not revolve around London and the South you know - there is life north of Manchester, and a superior brand it is too! A bit of common sense is called for on these matters - better wait a bit longer before launch than upset half the country

  14. Anonymous Says:

    K. Creighton, the 1911 Irish Census has been released for the counties of Antrim, Down, Dublin and Kerry - for free.

    The link is: http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/search/.

  15. Kath Chapman Says:

    I know you have a huge amount of work and it is so exciting that 1911 census is available so soon, but as Durham and N Yorks are the Counties I would like to see, have you a more defined idea - Spring or Summer perhaps? - of when they might be available within 2009. Thank you

  16. iantester Says:

    Springy is more likely than Summery for the remaining English counties but beyond that we can’t be more precise - we are looking into exactly this question at the moment.

  17. Phil Says:

    I would just like to know roughly when the Eat Riding of Yorkshire 1911 census will be available.

  18. E wALKER Says:

    Why wont they give ma a strsight answer to why my Father who most certainly lived in Longton Stoke on Trent is not on the census

  19. Frank Brash Says:

    You should either have waited until everything was available or made it very clear what you did or did not cover before getting people to buy credits, which will now probably expire before you make Durham (which is all I’m really interested in) becomes available.

    I’m sure this would not be right under trading standards.

  20. Peter Says:

    iantester says - “Springy is more likely than Summery for the remaining English counties but beyond that we can’t be more precise - we are looking into exactly this question at the moment”.

    I say - you just don’t care do you. You and your local area (London and the South no doubt) are OK, so you do not care less about anyone else. Your behaviour and parochialism is pathetic. You should be ashamed

  21. Northerner Says:

    As someone who only has ancestors from Durham and Northumberland, Cumberland and North Yorkshire, and still live in the area myself I am very disappointed that these counties have to wait. The launch was heralded on all the local news stations with great fanfare, but no mention that our area was missed for now. Also I feel that a lack of a date for when these counties will be included is a poor excuse. This far through a major digitising project, you should have a fair idea of how long it should take. As you say yourselves you’ve already done 83%, how long can the other 17% take?

  22. Dr David Alan Gatley Says:

    Has anyone had difficult searching for German or Austrian ancestors in the 1911 census?

    I have not found one particular family I’m looking for and I’m wondering if their census schedule was removed from the original bundle on the outbreak of war in 1914 so that the family could be registered as nationals from an enemy nation.

    David

  23. Phil Nicholson Says:

    Why launch the incomplete census?I agree with the comments - the corners of GB are yet again disregarded.I disappointed Northern researcher!

  24. gill Says:

    I have also had problems locating my German ancestors on the 1911 census. The parents were listed as ‘German subjects’ on the 1901 census. I am also wondering if this is to do with omission during the war. I am aware that my great granmother changed her name around this time, but I cannot locate the family under the changed name either.

  25. Peter Says:

    Phil Nicholson Says:

    January 26th, 2009 at 6:26 pm
    Why launch the incomplete census?I agree with the comments - the corners of GB are yet again disregarded.I disappointed Northern researcher!

    RESPONSE . . .

    Phil, get used to it mate. You (like me) are a genuine fully fledged “2nd class citizen” as far as findmypast.com are concerned.

    We do not even have our counties on the “1901″ Census yet (never mind 1911!!!!!) can you believe that. (yes, I’m sure you can).

    Oh . . to be an Essex girl . . . a member of the “findmypast.com privileged class”

  26. jill forster Says:

    like many of the researchers above I could not believe that the northern counties had been missed, I think the census should have been released all on the same day even if it meant waiting a while longer, and if there’s only a small amount to do how much will it take, northern researcher[cumbria] talk about the great divide

  27. iantester Says:

    @Frank Brash: as you can see, we have extended the validity of credits to allow users to search for counties which are not yet online.

  28. lesleymcg Says:

    Has anybody else had any problems with searching for members of their family in Longton, Stoke-on-Trent ?

Leave a Reply