<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Site features at launch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.1911census.co.uk/2009/01/site-features-at-launch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.1911census.co.uk/2009/01/site-features-at-launch/</link>
	<description>official blog for 1911census.co.uk</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://blog.1911census.co.uk/2009/01/site-features-at-launch/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.1911census.co.uk/?p=140#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>I think the census entry I need to see covers more than one page - only servants listed with the 3 month old child that I am interested in. Can anyone tell me how I will know if this is the case? Will there be an obvious annotation on the screen when I look at the original page that I have located? I wondered if I should click on previous household, but don't want to spend 30 credits unnecessarily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the census entry I need to see covers more than one page - only servants listed with the 3 month old child that I am interested in. Can anyone tell me how I will know if this is the case? Will there be an obvious annotation on the screen when I look at the original page that I have located? I wondered if I should click on previous household, but don&#8217;t want to spend 30 credits unnecessarily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iantester</title>
		<link>http://blog.1911census.co.uk/2009/01/site-features-at-launch/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>iantester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.1911census.co.uk/?p=140#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>@John: we're looking into this at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John: we&#8217;re looking into this at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.1911census.co.uk/2009/01/site-features-at-launch/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.1911census.co.uk/?p=140#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>It would be very helpful to have the ability to see more that the 20-22 person search results per page that you get at the moment.
Is it possible to get a choice, e.g., 50, 100, 500, ALL?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be very helpful to have the ability to see more that the 20-22 person search results per page that you get at the moment.<br />
Is it possible to get a choice, e.g., 50, 100, 500, ALL?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Nicholls</title>
		<link>http://blog.1911census.co.uk/2009/01/site-features-at-launch/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Nicholls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.1911census.co.uk/?p=140#comment-911</guid>
		<description>I have been trying now since Sunday to view/download an image but keep getting the "Sorry were busy" message. I bought 60 credits on Saturday and viewed one image, but feel I may never be able to redeem my last 30 credits before they expire. I do hope this is not a scam - I have been trying at extraordinarliy unsocialbe hours - how busy can it be !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been trying now since Sunday to view/download an image but keep getting the &#8220;Sorry were busy&#8221; message. I bought 60 credits on Saturday and viewed one image, but feel I may never be able to redeem my last 30 credits before they expire. I do hope this is not a scam - I have been trying at extraordinarliy unsocialbe hours - how busy can it be !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Boyd</title>
		<link>http://blog.1911census.co.uk/2009/01/site-features-at-launch/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.1911census.co.uk/?p=140#comment-690</guid>
		<description>I am getting the following when trying to access the web site http://www.1911census.co.uk/ from Australia:-

Content Encoding Error

             

The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression.
       

The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression.

    * Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem.
 I get this in Firefox and IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am getting the following when trying to access the web site <a href="http://www.1911census.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.1911census.co.uk/</a> from Australia:-</p>
<p>Content Encoding Error</p>
<p>The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression.</p>
<p>The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression.</p>
<p>    * Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem.<br />
 I get this in Firefox and IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline Parry</title>
		<link>http://blog.1911census.co.uk/2009/01/site-features-at-launch/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline Parry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.1911census.co.uk/?p=140#comment-504</guid>
		<description>Its says the England &#38; Wales 1911 census is now available.  How come none of the Welsh counties are on there then????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its says the England &amp; Wales 1911 census is now available.  How come none of the Welsh counties are on there then????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

