Comments on: Gateshead - released with Northumberland, rather than Durham

By: seo,smo,seo soft,seo base,proxy

seo,smo,seo soft,seo base,proxy — Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:39:06 +0000

seo,smo,seo soft,seo base,proxy…

[...]1911census.co.uk blog » Blog Archive » Gateshead - released with Northumberland, rather than Durham[...]…

By: samsung tv

samsung tv — Sun, 01 Apr 2012 03:38:20 +0000

samsung tv…

[...]1911census.co.uk blog » Blog Archive » Gateshead - released with Northumberland, rather than Durham[...]…

By: lista discoteca sutton

lista discoteca sutton — Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:57:18 +0000

lista discoteca sutton…

[...]1911census.co.uk blog » Blog Archive » Gateshead - released with Northumberland, rather than Durham[...]…

By: Cityjet

Cityjet — Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:54:06 +0000

Cityjet…

[...]1911census.co.uk blog » Blog Archive » Gateshead - released with Northumberland, rather than Durham[...]…

By: iantester

iantester — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:59:39 +0000

@Sendraguy: they’ve all been there since before Easter - see the more recent blog posts.

By: Sendraguy

Sendraguy — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:36:05 +0000

Things seem to have gone quiet. I realise that something somewhere must be being done. Where are the GATESHEAD records? There must be many, like me, who are awaiting the records of some 100,000+ people who lived in and around Gateshead in 1911.

By: Keith Hall

Keith Hall — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 11:54:43 +0000

Thanks to the Helpdesk, I have received my refund. It’s worth persisting.

By: Keith Hall

Keith Hall — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:43:08 +0000

@Doccas - I am also in the position of having wasted money searching for relatives in areas neighbouring Gateshead (see my comment March 23rd). I have already emailed them but, whilst they have noted that the census data was likely part of the missing Gateshead results, they seemed to have conveniently forgotten that I asked for a refund as well. Since my results might have shown up as part of the Chester Le Street division which is where they were in the 1901 census, I could be forgiven for having checked these entries in detail, before realising that there were actually many towns and villages missing from the Durham searches, none of which had been mentioned until I emailed them and commented in this blog.

This should have been pointed out on the actual site at the time, not tucked away in a blog posting.

I realise that the team have done a terrific job and without local knowledge could not have been in a position to pick up the communities were catalogued incorrectly, but it should not be the responsibility of their customers to pay money to verify that the data had been missed.

By: C.

C. — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:08:58 +0000

Much appreciated Ian. Thank you.

By: iantester

iantester — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:53:36 +0000

@C: it looks like we have a stable data release on our test site now which we will spend the day checking. If all goes well, we should be able to upload to live tomorrow or Wednesday.