Archive for the ‘Service update’ Category

All English counties now complete

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

Overnight, we have uploaded records for the remaining English Counties (Northumberland, Cumberland, Westmorland) and added the missing Gateshead district records into the county of Durham (they were incorrectly listed as part of Northumberland - this is now fixed and they are searchable under Durham, as they should be).

Therefore all English counties are now complete.

Scanning of Welsh records is well underway and we are working on the transcriptions of the first batch of Welsh counties, which will be the next data release. Although we do not have a precise release date for them yet, we anticipate that we will have some data from Wales available in the next 4 to 6 weeks.

Final 3 English counties - preparing for loading

Monday, April 6th, 2009

We are quality checking the final three English counties at the moment (Northumberland, Cumberland, Westmorland), as well as the missing Gateshead data from Durham (which was not uploaded with the rest of the county owing to an error in the master data catalogue, which has now been rectified).

If no problems are found, this data should be available on the live site either tomorrow or Wednesday. Gateshead data will be searchable under the county of Durham, as it should be.

UPDATE Tuesday 16:50: we’re redeploying the data now, it should start appearing late this evening / early tomorrow morning if all goes smoothly.

Existing users with 90 day credits have been extended by 90 days

Monday, March 23rd, 2009

We have extended the credits of users whose credits were due to expire between 12/04/09 and 22/06/09 by 90 days at no extra cost. This will affect all users who bought £6.95 credit packs between launch (January 13th) and yesterday (March 22nd) and have not since bought more credits or bought a larger package (these credits will have been extended accordingly).

All users affected will receive an email within the next 2 hours to confirm.

We hope you enjoy the (free) extra time to explore the records!

Please note that any £6.95 credits bought after yesterday will have the standard 90 day validity period applied.

Missing Yorkshire (west Riding) volumes now available on site

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

2 volumes of Yorkshire (West Riding) were not put online at the same time as the rest of the county as they were damaged and had to spend some time in Conservation Care at The National Archives before they could be scanned. These 2 volumes related to Knaresborough and Doncaster.

We are happy to tell you that these 2 final volumes are now live and available on the site and that Yorkshire (West Riding) is now complete.

New counties added: Yorkshire North & East ridings, Durham

Tuesday, March 17th, 2009

We have added another 3 counties, the keenly-awaited Yorkshire North & East ridings and Durham. All three counties are searchable as of now.

The next data release will be the final 3 English counties: Cumberland, Northumberland, Westmorland. We estimate these are approximately a month away.

Enjoy - let us know what you find.

90 day credits bought to date to be extended to 180 days

Friday, March 13th, 2009

Good news!

We are going to extend the expiry date of any credits with a 90 days expiry date (the £6.95 package) bought to date on 1911census.co.uk.

Their expiry date will be extended by an additional 90 days (meaning they will expire 180 days from the date of purchase), meaning that if you are waiting to research ancestors in counties not yet released, your credits will remain valid whilst the data comes online.

All users affected will be emailed to confirm the change of expiry date within the next 2 weeks. We will create a new post on the blog once the change has been made as well.

Users unsubscribed accidentally from newsletter - fixed

Thursday, March 12th, 2009

Around 1,500 people were accidentally unsubscribed from the last email newsletter, following a glitch in the email which meant that an unsubscribe link was put in the wrong place. We have now resubscribed those affected and sent a follow up email to apologise for the error and confirm their resubscription.

If you were afffected and did not receive an email to confirm your resubscription, please contact Customer Support.

Next 3 English counties: preparing for loading

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

We are preparing the next counties for loading onto the website during March. Depending on the speed of the data load and any problems found, we anticipate they should be available in 2-3 weeks.

At a minimum we will load the 2 remaining Ridings of Yorkshire and Durham. We may be able to get one or two others in at the same time if all goes well.

Improved data now on site, including some enhancements

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

We have loaded a fresh version of the searchable data onto the website, with a number of enhancements:

  • Transcription errors reported up to February have been checked and corrected where necessary
  • Data standardisation has been applied to first names to correct common mistakes such as Geroge for George
  • Data standardisation has been applied to ages to make them standard: for example the various ways that householders may have written “months” has been standardised
These changes should further improve the accuracy of your search - many more are on the way!

More address search tips

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

Address searching often requires a degree of lateral thinking to get the best results. Here’s a few extra tips and also some new features on the horizon which aim to make your searching easier. The post below is based in replying to questions from a customer searching in Dorking, Surrey but the points apply equally to addresses across the country.

The source of address details on the census is that taken from the original form filled in by the householder (this contrasts with previous censuses, where the forms were compiled by the enumerator, thus introducing some level of standardisation in recording). Unfortunately, several factors conspire to make the historical document problematic for finding addresses using 1911 census returns. 

The first is that in 1911, the concept of a full postal address with a number and street was less evolved than it is today. Many houses simply carried names and householders would then place the town afterwards. To take an example, looking at modern-day Pixham Lane in Dorking, Surrey, the majority of the houses carried names but most householders simply included their postal address as “name of house, Dorking” and this is the information that we transcribe. Unfortunately this was compounded by the small space on the original form left for the address, meaning the householder would often abbreviate the address to make it fit. Have a look at an example of an Original Page to see how small the space was for your ancestors to enter their address. 

The second is that many householders used abbreviations for words (as we do today), such as “Rd” for “Road”. Again using an example of Lincon Road in Dorking (around the corner from Pixham Lane) if you search for “Lincoln” on its own in Dorking, Surrey all 44 properties are returned sequentially, some listed as “Lincoln Road” others as “Lincoln Rd”. Try searching for just the first part of the address and leaving off lanes, Roads, Crescents etc, but narrow the search area by county and district first.

We will be applying many data enhancements and standardisation processes over the coming months to compensate for these common inconsistencies in the originals and to make the data more easily searchable. However, the transcriptions are in this case accurate based on the original documents. To get the best out of any historical document, a degree of lateral thinking often has to be applied. 

Thirdly, place names and spellings change: in the case above, Pixham had an alternative spelling of “Pixholme” and 35 properties are found in Dorking under this listing. If you can find contemporary maps of the area you are searching, either online or in local libraries and archives, these can prove useful as the name today may be utterly different.

 Finally, with 8 million different sets of handwriting, deciphering becomes extremely difficult and what may appear to be transcription errors (and in some cases are) occur. Thus we found one property transcribed as “Pischolme”. However, when examining the householder’s writing, the awful way he had formed the X would lead any person to transcribe it this way.

 We are working on a number of ways to make searching by address simpler in face of the difficulties posed by the original records, but the unique nature of the 1911 census means these methods have had to be worked out afresh for this census, and the census is very much work in progress, although to date hundreds of thousands of researchers have successfully used the service to identify the records they want to view.

 As well as applying many enhancements to the data to attempt to smooth over the inconsistencies of our ancestors, we will also release the RG78 Enumerators Summary Books soon (current estimate is April), which list the households and heads in each area: this information is invaluable for identifying neighbouring houses when the address information left by our ancestors makes this hard to recover. If you have already paid to view a household image, you will be able to view the linked Enumerators images for free, by returning to your saved records. You will not be required to make further payment to view these.

We will also be adding a wildcard search to the street field to allow you to search laterally and many more data standardisations will be applied over the coming months.